Home › Guides › Commercial privileges oral
Commercial Pilot — Airplane & Helicopter
Commercial Pilot Oral Exam Questions: Privileges, Common Carriage & Part 119
The commercial oral lives and dies on one distinction: a commercial certificate lets you be paid to fly, but it does not let you sell air transportation. The examiner will hand you scenario after scenario — 'a friend offers you $500 to fly him to a meeting in a rented 182' — and grade whether you can spot when an operation requires an air carrier or operating certificate under Part 119.
Master four ideas and every scenario decodes: holding out, common carriage, the 119.1(e) exceptions (the jobs you can do tomorrow), and who provides the airplane (wet versus dry). References: 61.133, Part 119, AC 120-12A (common carriage), and the Part 91 rules that host the exceptions (91.146, 91.147).
Holding out and common carriage
Common carriage (AC 120-12A) has four elements: (1) holding out a willingness (2) to transport persons or property (3) from place to place (4) for compensation. Holding out means communicating to the public — or a segment of it — that you're willing to provide transportation: advertising, a website, business cards, word of mouth through an agent, or a pattern of serving anyone who asks. Do all four and you're a common carrier needing a Part 119 certificate (and typically Part 121/135 operations). Private carriage — carrying for one or a few selected customers under contract, without holding out — still requires an operating certificate when done for compensation, but under different rules; it's a narrower lane than most applicants think (a 'contract' with anyone who calls is just holding out with extra steps).
Compensation is broad: money, flight time you'd otherwise pay for, goodwill with business value. The clean framework for any scenario: Who provides the aircraft? Is transportation being sold? Is there holding out? Which exception, if any, applies? Walking those four questions out loud is exactly the performance the examiner wants.
The 119.1(e) list and wet vs dry
Part 119.1(e) lists operations excepted from air-carrier certification — the jobs a freshly minted commercial pilot can legally do: flight instruction (under student/instructor rules), nonstop commercial air tours within 25 SM of the departure airport (under 91.147 with an LOA and drug/alcohol program), ferry and training flights, aerial work — crop dusting, banner towing, aerial photography or survey, fire fighting, powerline/pipeline patrol, and external-load rotorcraft operations (Part 133 for helicopters), plus parachute-jump flights within the rule's limits and a few others. The pattern: the customer is buying a service in which flight is incidental or local — not transportation from A to B.
Wet vs dry: a dry lease provides the aircraft alone — the lessee gains operational control, supplies their own pilot, and the operation can stay under Part 91. A wet lease bundles aircraft and crew — providing both while charging for carriage is the classic illegal-charter fact pattern without a certificate. So the famous scenario: 'your friend rents the airplane himself (dry, from an unrelated FBO) and separately hires you to fly it' can be legitimate — but if you (or your business) supply both airplane and pilot to someone buying transportation, you've built a charter. Examiners also expect you to know your new certificate's fine print: 61.133 lets you act as PIC for compensation; carrying passengers for hire at night or beyond 50 NM requires an instrument rating (a limitation printed on the certificate if you lack one); and second-in-command and corporate-pilot jobs are fully legitimate compensation without any 119 issue because the company isn't selling transportation to the public.
Practice questions with answers & rationales
Q1. Can you fly your neighbor to a business meeting two states away for $500 the day after your checkride?
Answer: Not the way it's framed. He's buying air transportation from A to B; if you provide pilot and arrange the airplane, that's carriage for compensation requiring a 119 certificate — and a pattern of doing it for whoever asks is common carriage. The potentially legal restructure: he dry-leases an airplane from an unrelated source (he has operational control) and separately employs you as his pilot — then nobody is selling him transportation; he's operating his own flight with a hired commercial pilot. Walking through the difference is the whole point of the question.
Q2. What four elements define common carriage?
Answer: Holding out a willingness; to transport persons or property; from place to place; for compensation or hire — all four, per AC 120-12A. 'Holding out' is the load-bearing element: advertising in any form, agents, or a 'we'll fly anyone' pattern. A single one-off favor for a friend may lack holding out; a Facebook post offering rides for gas money has it in writing.
Q3. Name jobs you can do tomorrow with just your commercial certificate (and appropriate ratings/endorsements).
Answer: Flight instruction (after the CFI), banner towing, crop dusting/agricultural work, aerial photography and survey, pipeline and powerline patrol, ferry flights, glider towing, sightseeing air tours within 25 SM under 91.147 (operator LOA, drug/alcohol program), parachute operations within the exception, fire fighting, and helicopter external load under Part 133. Common thread: local or aerial-work operations under 119.1(e) — not point-to-point transportation sold to the public. Plus salaried corporate/SIC flying, where no transportation is sold.
Q4. Why does aerial photography escape the 119 requirement when carrying the photographer is still 'transporting a person for money'?
Answer: Because the customer isn't buying transportation — they're buying a service (images) for which the flight is incidental, conducted locally without carriage from place to place. That's the analytical lens for the whole 119.1(e) list, and examiners love hearing the principle rather than the memorized list: ask 'what is the customer actually purchasing?'
Q5. What is the practical difference between a wet lease and a dry lease, and why do examiners care?
Answer: Dry lease: aircraft only — the lessee takes operational control, hires the crew, and can operate under Part 91. Wet lease: aircraft with crew — the lessor retains operational control and, when transporting people/property for compensation, generally needs a 119 certificate. Examiners care because sham dry leases are the FAA's enforcement priority: if one party really supplies plane-plus-pilot and the 'lease' is paperwork, it's an illegal charter, and the commercial pilot flying it is in the enforcement crosshairs too.
Q6. Without an instrument rating, what limitation does your commercial certificate carry?
Answer: 'The carriage of passengers for hire on cross-country flights in excess of 50 nautical miles or at night is prohibited' — printed on the certificate per 61.133. You could still fly local-area passenger work for hire in day VFR and non-passenger operations beyond that. It's a favorite question for applicants who did commercial before instrument — know whether it applies to you personally.
Q7. A nonprofit asks you to fly donors at a fundraising event for free plane rides. Legal?
Answer: Potentially, under 91.146 (charitable, nonprofit, community-event flights) — which has specific conditions: the rule's experience requirement (e.g., at least 500 hours for the PIC), a 14-day FSDO notification, standard-category aircraft, day-VFR-style limits, and event/sponsor restrictions. The takeaway to voice: 'free' doesn't remove compensation analysis (goodwill counts), so charity flights work because a specific regulation authorizes them with strings — and I'd read 91.146 before saying yes.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Answering 'I'm commercial now, so I can be paid to fly people places.' Paid to fly, yes; selling transportation, no.
- Treating 'private carriage' as a loophole. Contract carriage for compensation still requires an operating certificate — just not the common-carrier kind.
- Forgetting compensation includes logged flight time and goodwill, not just cash.
- Missing the instrument-rating limitation (50 NM / night passenger-for-hire prohibition) when it applies to the applicant personally.
- Blessing a plane-plus-pilot package deal as a 'dry lease.' Who has operational control is the test, not the label.
- Reciting the 119.1(e) list without the principle (service vs transportation), then falling apart on a scenario not on the list.